Avatar: Fire and Ash

We start this one the only way we know how: Pete quits his job (casually), we open a bottle of potentially corked wine (possibly poisonous), and then—somehow—end up reviewing Avatar 3, despite half the room not even watching Avatar 2.

Pete’s approach is simple: he’s not here to defend or attack Avatar. He’s here to report back from the front lines of three hours and ten minutes of James Cameron doing what James Cameron does.

The setup (in plain English)

You’ve got:

• Jungle people (from Avatar 1)
• Sea people (Avatar 2)
• Now: Fire people (Avatar 3)

The grief and revenge angle ramps up after the events of the second film, and the new “fire clan” are positioned as more brutal, more pagan, and basically built to escalate the conflict. The humans (the “sky people”) are still doing what humans do: exploiting the planet, weaponising alliances, and trying to crack the next big advantage.

What we actually talk about

• Skipping straight to film three: why it’s weirdly possible, because these films run on a repeating template.
• Spider and the “air-breather” idea: a human kid embedded with the Na’vi, and the implications if humans can reverse-engineer breathing on Pandora.
• The fire clan: their volcanic backstory, their vibe shift from the earlier tribes, and the “new enemy faction” energy.
• The villain problem: how characters keep “dying” in ways that clearly don’t stick, setting up sequels forever.
• The big third-act battle: yet another massive end set-piece, but with a new environmental twist that feels… very convenient.
• The core contradiction: the storytelling is bloated and recycled, but the spectacle is undeniable.

The verdict

Pete’s take lands here: these films are ridiculous, repetitive, and absolutely stunning to look at. As cinema experiences, they’re hard to argue with visually. As stories, they’re basically a shiny loop — but a shiny loop that keeps making a billion dollars.

If you want to hear us:

• unravel the plot without pretending it’s deep,
• argue about whether Avatar has any cultural footprint at all,
• and admit (through gritted teeth) that Cameron’s visuals are still operating on a different level…

…this episode is for you.

You can now text us anonymously to leave feedback, suggest future content or simply hurl abuse at us. We'll read out any texts we receive on the show. Click here to try it out!

We love to hear from our listeners! By which I mean we tolerate it. If it hasn't been completely destroyed yet you can usually find us on twitter @dads_film, on Facebook Bad Dads Film Review, on email at baddadsjsy@gmail.com or on our website baddadsfilm.com.

Until next time, we remain...

Bad Dads